Google+ Followers

Thursday, 12 June 2014

My kids are ok, yours can go beg. - - The Australian Independent Media Network

My kids are ok, yours can go beg. - - The Australian Independent Media Network



My kids are ok, yours can go beg.














When I hear Joe Hockey say, with trembling lip, that he refuses to
saddle his children with the nation’s debt, my hypocrisy radar maxes
out.



For starters, Joe Hockey’s children will never have to struggle.  His
wife is a very wealthy woman and they have substantial investments.



Secondly, this talk of our children being saddled with our debt is an
obvious advertising strategy that the Coalition has adopted.  Whenever
children are mentioned we get protective so it is a deliberate attempt
to play on the heartstrings of families.



The trouble is that this statement bears no scrutiny.


If we are really concerned about our children we would be taking
urgent action on climate change.  Putting that off for our kids to have
to deal with sometime in the future is criminal neglect.



We would also be striving to make our society an even better one than
the one we inherited.  We grew up with free education and universal
health care.  We should not be going backwards in these most crucial
areas.  Will our contribution to our children’s future be to say sorry,
you may not enjoy the benefits that we did?



We fought for workplace entitlements like minimum wages and penalty
rates.  Are we to say to our kids that your labour is worth less?



We have told our young people that they must “earn or learn”.  I am
sure that every kid, and every family, would prefer that situation, but
all I see is another three word slogan.  There is no plan for jobs. 
Rather than increasing apprenticeships, they are closing trade training
centres and increasing 457 visas.  They are making university education
unaffordable – their justification being that no-one has to pay up
front.  So apparently it is alright to saddle our children with huge
personal debt, just as long as Tony and Joe can say look, no deficit.



With no old school tie network of daddy’s friends to give you a job,
it can be very hard for young people with no experience to enter the
workforce.  The soul destroying exercise of applying for countless jobs
and being rejected every time can be heartbreaking.  Is it any wonder
that some just give up looking or turn to substance abuse as their sense
of self worth takes a hammering?



What is to become of these kids as we cut off any support to them for
6 months of the year?  Why are we abandoning them when they are just
starting out on life’s road and need our help most?



We have evolved into a nation where someone’s worth is measured by
their wealth, where there are no excuses tolerated.  If you aren’t
wealthy you just aren’t trying.  What chance do our kids have to enter
this merry-go-round?



A national snapshot of rental affordability in Australia has found
there are minuscule and in some cases, zero, levels of affordable
housing for people on low incomes, with welfare advocates saying some
people will be forced to go without food to afford their accommodation.



The report, prepared by Anglicare Australia, found single Australians
on government payments are “seriously disadvantaged” in the housing
market, with less than 1 per cent of properties examined deemed
suitable.



Single people with no children living on the minimum wage were
slightly better off, with 4 per cent of listed properties found
suitable, according to the study.



The study defined a “suitable” rental as one that took up less than 30 per cent of the household’s income.


It also found that couples with two children on the minimum wage had
access to 12 per cent of properties surveyed, while just 1.4 per cent of
properties were suitable for couples with two children on Newstart.



On the snapshot day, just 3.6 per cent of properties were found suitable for age pensioners.


Anglicare Australia executive director Kasy Chambers said the lack of
affordable housing damaged the lives of millions of ordinary
Australians.



“Limited supply does more than just drive up the price of housing. It
forces those on lower incomes to spend more on rent than they can
afford; compels them to forgo food and other necessities and drives them
further away from social and economic participation.”



A coalition of peak housing bodies – including Homelessness Australia
and the Community Housing Federation of Australia called on Kevin
Andrews to make affordable housing a priority.  His response was that it
is a state issue, and the federal government was “encouraging and
supporting” states to streamline their planning and development
processes, and review taxes and charges levied at home construction and
purchases.



In other words, he couldn’t give a damn that his government’s
negative gearing policy has made it impossible for many young people to
enter the housing market.



A quarter of Australian properties are being bought for investment rather than to live in.


Over the last four years the number of investment property loans in
Australia has grown by 37% compared to an increase of only 4% in the
number of owner occupied loans, new data from Roy Morgan Research shows.



The growth in investment property loans over the last four years has
come predominantly from the 35 to 64 age groups which account for 78% of
the increase.



The study, which surveyed 45,455 Australians, showed while the
proportion of over-50’s with an owner-occupied home loan has increased,
the proportion of under-35’s with owner-occupied home loans decreased.



Roy Morgan communications director Norman Morris believes government policy is having an impact on loan types.


“Younger Australians may continue to find it difficult to enter the
property market either for investment or owner-occupied because for both
types they are competing with more cashed-up older property buyers.”



There are currently 105,237 people in Australia who are homeless. 
That means that on any given night, 1 in 200 people in Australia have
nowhere to sleep.  While Malcolm Turnbull joins the CEO sleepout in his
comfortable warm swag, his government cut $44 million from funding for
the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness.  This money was to
be spent on capital works building shelters for homeless people and
providing affordable housing for women and children.



There has been an upsurge of photos of Coalition MPs with charity
groups with politicians exhorting us to donate more.  Someone needs to
remind this government that the money they are spending is ours and I
would much prefer to be looking after the vulnerable in our society and
around the world than subsidising corporate greed and supporting
armaments manufacturers.



Recent articles by Kaye Lee:


War games


Who are the real leaners here?


Some of my best friends are corrupt


Voter Directed Learning

No comments:

Post a Comment